Social critic Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), arrived at the Lagos High Court on November 14 in traditional Edo attire for the hearing of the defamation suit filed against him by Nigerian rapper Falz and his father, renowned lawyer Femi Falana, SAN.
The defamation case stems from a video VDM posted, in which he made uncomplimentary remarks about the Falanas while analyzing a controversial audio clip involving crossdresser Bobrisky and an unidentified man. In the clip, Bobrisky allegedly claimed that Falz reached out to him while Bobrisky was in prison, offering to use his father’s influence to secure a presidential pardon. The clip also included an assertion that Bobrisky had paid an SAN N10 million to facilitate the pardon.
VDM, in his video analysis, expressed his surprise at the alleged connection between the Falanas and Bobrisky, questioning the validity of the claims. “Abi Falz dey do?” VDM asked rhetorically, which many observers interpreted as questioning the rapper’s sexuality.
This comment led to widespread public attention, with many criticizing VDM for insinuating Falz’s sexual orientation. Despite the backlash, the Falanas demanded an apology and retraction from VDM, which he failed to provide. As a result, they filed a defamation lawsuit against him, seeking legal redress for the damage caused by his remarks.
In court on November 14, VDM, who is known for his outspokenness on social issues, made a statement through his traditional Edo attire. His appearance seemed deliberate, as he appeared unfazed by the legal battle and was seen engaging with the media outside the court.
While the details of the court proceedings were not immediately made public, the case has sparked significant discussions about the line between freedom of expression and defamation, especially when dealing with high-profile individuals like Falz and his father, Femi Falana.
Falz, a well-known rapper and activist, and his father, who is a senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN), have yet to make a public statement regarding VDM’s choice of attire or the ongoing court proceedings. However, it is clear that the case is not only about the defamation claim but also about protecting personal dignity and reputation in the age of social media.
As the case continues to unfold, it will likely set a precedent for future legal battles involving social media personalities and public figures in Nigeria.
